Excerpt from
The Solesmes Method
Its Fundamental Principles and Practical
Rules of Interpretation
Dom Joseph Gajard
© The Order of St. Benedict, Inc., Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced by any means, without the written permission of The Liturgical Press, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321.
Contents
Foreword
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS: THE MOST IMPORTANT ATTEMPTS AT INTERPRETATION
Mensuralism
Free Rhythm
Free Speech Rhythm
Free Musical Rhythm
The Solesmes Method
Part I
Fundamental Principles
1. The Inherently Musical Nature of Gregorian Rhythm
2. Rhythm Must Necessarily Be Well
Defined
a) The
single or primary beat
b) The
grouping of primary beats into compound beats
c) The
grouping of compound beats into larger units
3. Complete Independence of Rhythm and Volume of Sound or Stress
4. Independence of the Rhythmic Ictus and the Latin Tonic Accent
5. Subordination of the Words to the Melody
6. Traditional Marks of Expression
Part II
Practical Rules of Interpretation
A. Rules of Rhythmical Technique
1. Respect for the Primary Beat
2. Exact Time-Value of the Compound Binary and Ternary Beats
3. Gentle Descents
4. The Latin
Tonic Accent
The Respect Due to Spondaic and Dactylic Verbal Forms
5. The Composite Rhythm
6. Greater Rhythm (Le Grand Rythme)
7. The Dynamic Line
8. Chironomy
B. Rules of Style
1. Legato
2. The Lightness of High Notes
3. Verbal or Melodic "Distinctions"
4. Flexibility of the Tempo
5. The Horizontal Episema
6. Ordinary Neums Have No Special Influence on Style
7. Advice
Concerning the Following Neums
a) The pressus preceded by a single note on a new syllable
b) The climacus
c) Liquescent notes
8. The Occasional broadening of Single Beats
9. Continuity of Line
Conclusion: Gregorian Art as Prayer
Chapter 1
Preliminary Observations
The Most Important Attempts At
Interpretation
The task of restoring the Gregorian
melodies, begun approximately a century ago, has been long and arduous, and this
fact is perhaps too little known. Much ground had to be covered, and for
the workers who undertook this heavy task it meant starting from practically
zero as regards both melody and rhythm. Great demands were made on their
time and patience as the gropingly felt their was toward the full light.
This was particularly the case in everything concerning rhythm, about which
information was very deficient.
Many systems have been put forward, most often independently
of one another. They have me the varying success; for some, failure was to
be expected.
I wish here to explain the method of interpretation
established by Dom Mocquereau, which is known as the "Solesmes
Method." In order to leave the reader in no doubt as to what
characterizes this method, I think it will be useful to first summarize the
principal attempt at interpretation which have been made and which are now but
faint landmarks on the long road which has been covered. In doing this I
shall not attempt to refute them, but, by a process of elimination, I shall
remove obstructions and thus pave the way for my thesis, so this it may, by
contrast, stand out the more clearly.
The methods of interpretation so far given to the public can
be broadly divided into two categories: Those of the mensuralists or
partisans of so-called measured rhythm, and those of the partisans of so-called
rhythm.